C
CThompson
Help me understand what the limitations are.
I've got a 65 Alpine with no engine, hope to pick it up this weekend.
Included is a 2.8 and "Some automatic transmission".
I've read all the posts here, and scoured google, and while I'm sure the 2.8 is a fine lump, there seems to be a lack of an aftermarket for it. I may end up going with the 2.8, since I'm trying to build a car for the GRM $2007 challenge, and the cost may be prohibitive otherwise.
Isn't the Tiger the same relative chassis, with a Ford small block, like a 302?
Is the distributor the only real factor that makes a Small Block Chevy a no go? I can get SBCs for pocket change. I had planned to go with a MegaSquirt and MegaJolt regardless of engine, so this would be a distributorless car.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not an american muscle gearhead. I'm not looking to cram a ZZ572 into an alpine. But I do want to put in an engine with potential. Thumbing through the Summit Racing catalog last night, I found 300 pages of stuff for the SBC. Loads of potential.
I've got a 65 Alpine with no engine, hope to pick it up this weekend.
Included is a 2.8 and "Some automatic transmission".
I've read all the posts here, and scoured google, and while I'm sure the 2.8 is a fine lump, there seems to be a lack of an aftermarket for it. I may end up going with the 2.8, since I'm trying to build a car for the GRM $2007 challenge, and the cost may be prohibitive otherwise.
Isn't the Tiger the same relative chassis, with a Ford small block, like a 302?
Is the distributor the only real factor that makes a Small Block Chevy a no go? I can get SBCs for pocket change. I had planned to go with a MegaSquirt and MegaJolt regardless of engine, so this would be a distributorless car.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not an american muscle gearhead. I'm not looking to cram a ZZ572 into an alpine. But I do want to put in an engine with potential. Thumbing through the Summit Racing catalog last night, I found 300 pages of stuff for the SBC. Loads of potential.