Welcome to the new SAOCA website. Already a member? Simply click Log In/Sign Up up and to the right and use your same username and password from the old site. If you've forgotten your password, please send an email to membership@sunbeamalpine.org for assistance.
If you're new here, click Log In/Sign Up and enter your information. We'll approve your account as quickly as possible, typically in about 24 hours. If it takes longer, you were probably caught in our spam/scam filter.
Enjoy.
I think 1.6 per cubic in is a bit optimistic! The old rule of thumb I grew up with was it has to breathe it has to exhaust the gasses in other words cam carb and exhaust!So, do you believe those HP numbers?
Lets do some math...1725cc = 105.3 cu in
170.4 HP/105.3cu in =1.6 HP/cu in
Do you see where I'm going with this?
Jan
Suck, squish, bang, blow...I think 1.6 per cubic in is a bit optimistic! The old rule of thumb I grew up with was it has to breathe it has to exhaust the gasses in other words cam carb and exhaust!
Anything is possible with enough money, or how fast you want to go is how much money you have!Suck, squish, bang, blow...
I struggle to see a legal 1592 breaking into 175hp territory... 150 flywheel... Sure.. With a very soecial motor... I recall in the early 2000s an alpine that ran in the modsports uk/ usa challenge that had a billet crank 1725 waste spark ignition and 45dcoes and a straight cut 5 speed dog 'box that was very quick...
depends on the series engine. 3 mains are strong forged steel cranks, but buzz them out an they will still break (lack of bearing support).What methods are you using to strengthen the crankshaft? Surface treatment, heat treatment or what is known to be effective?
Wish someone would make us a bunch of 4130 billet 5 main cranks...
It would be nice!depends on the series engine. 3 mains are strong forged steel cranks, but buzz them out an they will still break (lack of bearing support).
5 mains are nodular iron, not as strong as steel but it takes the revs better becuase it has 5 mains.
Wish someone would make us a bunch of 4130 billet 5 main cranks...
The question is.. Rootes archive have the drawings.. But if making new...may as well knife edge the counterweight as well... And do the journals to big end sizes common to jap or other hogh performance rods ....
Wish someone would make us a bunch of 4130 billet 5 main cranks...
Come on, Michael. I can see a whole new future for you manufacturing kits for hot rodding 1725 engines. We had a V6 Jose. How about an "1850 Michael"?Im in a decent lcation to get them done....maybe i sould enquire
1850....so short sighted E man....
If we are doing 1725 hotrod kits surely we are doing billet stroker cranks? Lets get some longer throw and make it possible to go 2000cc with a 0.40 overbore...... Hmmm....
Michael,
About to open Pandora's box? I'll help.
Light steel and aluminum flywheels, better torsional dampers and attachment design, cams to utilize increased displacement, maybe new head and manifolds designs, provide for a modern electronic ignition, and maybe a new bell housing to accommodate a modern OD trans?
One improvement always leads to somebody wanting the next level improvement.
I think as a first step on this path, a search for an aftermarket crank forging - I4 and maybe V8 before twisting - that could be machined to 1725+ specs might allow a suitable start point. An existing forging with redefined machining would certainly allow a better start price point.
If it's possible to install a Volvo head on a Ford block, maybe this is possible, also.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwirgYa9pJ7yAhVTLs0KHQ6rCuQQwqsBegQIBxAB&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvVY9z7-l0U&usg=AOvVaw07zVy6W_ZVLXRYbDOnTce0
You are absolutely correct! I don't know what I was thinking. "2 Litre King" has a nice ring to it.1850....so short sighted E man....
If we are doing 1725 hotrod kits surely we are doing billet stroker cranks? Lets get some longer throw and make it possible to go 2000cc with a 0.40 overbore...... Hmmm....
TTV already do very high end billet aluminum flywheels for early and late cars and high performance light weight pressure plates and clutches.
Bill, the r&d on a head and manufacture would be way more than a crankshaft... The crank could either just be made from the stock drawings and produced with knife edging done or offset mains without much issue..Maybe its just me, but it seems that good Alpine heads are hard to find, maybe time for an aftermarket head with stock external appearance,, but everything else modernized. I also continue to wonder why no one has produced long Tiger steering arms, which when matched with MG Midget rack would alleviate the Ackerman problem and produced stock steering ratio.
Bill
I dont seem much value in billet caps. Pinning the cast iron caps would be a good idea though.May I suggest an order of billet crank bearing caps to go with that order, sir. Makes a tasty side dish and rounds out the meal.
I was only dreaming, sorry.
I don't see much value in billet caps. Pinning the cast iron caps would be a good idea though.
A USA company makes several versions of the balancers, uprated steel and 2 versions of lightweight billet aluminum.
But a stock head would be a big project... Perhaps with 3d printing it could be more achievable..
If you wanted a more modern design.. Or at minimum a head where you sorted the exhaust passages to flow instead of their horrible hard turn from the chamber..
3D printing and lost foam casting should mean the actual casting is the least of related problems. Every decision is a compromise and every change leads to at least one more change. Fixing the port turn is relatively simple by adding height between the combustion chamber top and bottom of exhaust port runner. What other changes would have to be made to accommodate this simple fix? Even after adjusting the exhaust port turn, the other major exhaust issue hasn't been touched. The combustion chamber's pocketed and shrouded exhaust valve. Maybe a rotated combustion chamber with smaller, angled and canted valves could be part of the answer. But now nothing lines up.
Pandora's box.