• Welcome to the new SAOCA website. Already a member? Simply click Log In/Sign Up up and to the right and use your same username and password from the old site. If you've forgotten your password, please send an email to membership@sunbeamalpine.org for assistance.

    If you're new here, click Log In/Sign Up and enter your information. We'll approve your account as quickly as possible, typically in about 24 hours. If it takes longer, you were probably caught in our spam/scam filter.

    Enjoy.

"Great Escape" survivor dies.

Nickodell

Donation Time
Sydney Dowse who has just died at age 89, was one of the main constructors of the Great Escape tunnel at Stalag Luft III, as featured in the film of the same name. A Spitfire pilot, Dowse was shot down over France in September 1941 and had to bale out with a wounded leg. Thus started a series of escapes unequalled in WWI or II.

Spitfireescaper.jpg


First, he escaped from the hospital where he was being treated, but was recaptured three days later crossing the German/Dutch border. Sent to Stalag Luft IXC, he mingled with a working party and got away again, catching a train to Belgium, then on foot to the border. There, suffering from exhaustion and exposure he was captured again and imprisoned at Oflag VIB, where he helped to build four tunnels, through one of which four officers escaped in April 1942.

From there he was sent to the "punishment camp" Stalag Luft III, at Sagan, one of Goering's "escape-proof" camps where multiple escapees were sent. From this he made two more unsuccessful attempts, before joining the escape committee headed by Sq. Ldr. Roger Bushell (played by Richard Attenbrough in the movie), known by the code name Big X.

Three tunnels - Tom, Dick and Harry - were started, and Dowse worked on Harry, the one that was ultimately used in the big escape. His other job was to obtain up-to-date passes and other documents essential for any successful escape. He did this by befriending a German corporal guard, ultimately obtaining numerous authentic documents for the camp "forgers" to copy, and even civilian clothes. (James Garner's part as "The Scrounger" in the movie was partly based on Dowse's exploits.)

By mid-March 1944, Harry was ready, and on the night of the 23rd. the tunnelers broke out, to find that they were a few yards short of the trees intended to cover their escape. Dowse was the 21st. to exit, along with his Polish friend "Danny" Krol (played by Charles Bronson in the movie), and the two headed for the Polish border. Dowse, through his German guard, had obtained a three-week supply of genuine food vouchers, which they used along the way for meals, masquerading as Polish workers. After walking for 14 days they were close to the Polish border when they were recaptured (easily the last of the tunnel escapers to be caught). While Dowse was taken to Berlin for interrogation, Krol was one of the 50 murdered on the orders of Adolf Hitler.

After interrogation, Dowse was sent to the death camp at Sachsenhausen, where he found three others of the tunnel escapees. Undeterred by the threat of execution, the four dug a 110 ft. tunnel, using a kitchen knife. On the night of September 23 they broke out, causing consternation among the Germans, who put a high price on their heads. To confuse the enemy, they headed west instead of east towards Poland, but were captured near Berlin. Back in Sachsenhausen they were chained to concrete floors for five months of solitary confinement, then moved to another notorious death camp, Dachau, where they were scheduled for execution, but were finally liberated by Allied forces in May 1945. Dowse was awarded the Military Cross for his escape activities.

Trivia Note: Donald Pleasance, who plays "The Forger" in the movie was in real life a POW in Stalag Luft III, but not chosen as one of the escapees - which would probably have deprived us of the pleasure of seeing him in numerous films, like Telefon (ironically, also featuring Charles Bronson) and as Ernst Stavros Blofeld in one of the Bond movies.
 

Pumpkin

Donation Time
The Great Escape

Nick that was great. Thanks for that input, it opened a new view for me. Or for new information I didn't have.
Thanks again.
Chuck
 

skywords

Donation Time
PBS / NOVA had a special on this escape and they went to the site of the camp and dug the tunnels up. The soil is mostly sand and very dangerous to dig in. Some of the survivors of the camp were there for the digging and verified the various places such as the entrances etc. they found many KLIM milk cans that they used to dig with. KLIM is milk spelled backwards. They also found one of the stamps that were fabricated to forge the documents. Watch for it I am sure it will be re run again. God Bless PBS the last free television station.

A monument has been erected near by to the fallen prisoners.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/teachers/programs/3117_greatesc.html
 

Nickodell

Donation Time
The movie was quite close to the facts, except for the character played by Steve McQueen and the James Garner aircraft-stealing episode. In order to make the film saleable in the US (and even to get a studio interested enough to front the money) it was essential to cast at least one big-name American star, hence McQueen and Garner.

People have complained that there were no Americans in the actual escape, but the fact is that several took part in the digging and ancillary activities (security, forging documents, making equipment such as lighting and ventilation for the tunnel), and it was ironic that they were moved to a different camp shortly before the breakout (which might have saved their lives, as it turned out).

In any event, better a film where 90% was true to life, plus a bit of artistic license, than no film at all. The producers of Battle of Britain attempted to keep 100% authenticity by not casting any American stars; the result was a box-office flop over here.
 

mikephillips

Donation Time
Of course almost every film based on an historical incident has some amount of artisic license, how can you tell most stories in the 90-120 minutes film generally allows. The film Gods and Generals is a good example. Most of the details are correct but it tries to cram 18 months or so of the civil war period into 3 hours and doesn't make clear that the first Fredricksburg battle depicted and Chancellorsville are nearly a year apart. You needed to know something of the history to know where what's missing or you get a confused picture.
 

Bill Blue

Platinum Level Sponsor
Any film that tells a story that was not created for the big screen seems to suffer. My wife complains about every Harry Potter movie. They leave 90% of the book out of the movie version.

Bill
 

Nickodell

Donation Time
Sometimes the movie is better than the book!

A good example of this is The Ipcress File. The book was a rather turgid read, while the movie was superbly written and directed, with a real "Hitchc*ck" twist. That's just my opinion, of course.

Continuing the IMHO theme; the new Casino Royale is the only Bond movie that my wife and I have turned off 2/3 the way through. Apart from (we think) a rotten choice for Bond (what happened to the tall, dark iconic spy?), some of the best parts of the book were changed or totally missing. E.g: Instead of Baccarat, they play Texas Holdem poker. Anything to be topical; after all, how many American hayseeds know what Baccarat is? One of the key scenes in the book, where the assassin leans close to Bond as he's playing, and whispers that he has a silent, air-powered gun pointed at Bond's spine, and if he presses the trigger Bond will simply collapse and people will think he's had a heart attack, is omitted.

And, unless the copy we were viewing had a bit cut out, at one point we see Bond playing cards and the next instant he's walking to his hotel room. Not a fade-to, or mix-dissolve; just an instant scene change. So, did he win at cards?

And we think that Judy Dench is a lousy "M." Did they have to cast a woman, for Political Correctness, and if they did, why not a sure-fire tough character actress like Helen Mirren?

However, we appear to be in a minority; most of our friends love the film.
 

mikephillips

Donation Time
You're right Nick, a good screenwriter knows the subject and knows what's important to leave in and what can be removed without hurting the overall story. But it seems that too many folks doing that these days are not looking for a good story but what can attract the most people in the theatre door. And many film folks don't seem to know when a book really can't be made into a film because of complexity or number of required characters or such. I read years ago Clive Cussler's Raise the Titanic and it's good as adventure storys go, you just suspend disbelief of the known facts sometimes. The movie however was awful, they changed motivations for characters, dropped ones necessary to the plot and actually ended the film at what was the middle of the book. That book wasn't a good choice for a film.
 
Top