• Welcome to the new SAOCA website. Already a member? Simply click Log In/Sign Up up and to the right and use your same username and password from the old site. If you've forgotten your password, please send an email to membership@sunbeamalpine.org for assistance.

    If you're new here, click Log In/Sign Up and enter your information. We'll approve your account as quickly as possible, typically in about 24 hours. If it takes longer, you were probably caught in our spam/scam filter.

    Enjoy.

"Weekend Racer" Alpine Back running!

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
Not ready for Prime Time

I guess y all are not ready for Streaming coverage (of the LBCs), YET....

(as far as I know, there were some groups streamed, but not all of the groups.)


The only changes to the WR were the Webers, since the last time at Laguna.

So I was curious how much the lap time would change.


On Friday, after the rain, there was a small stream crossing the track

on the entrance to turn 3, that gave most drivers, including me,

a reason NOT to hit turn 3 at 10 10ths!

And then, I found myself chasing a Morgan 4/4, that was more fun than trying to get the best lap times.

The Morgan would drive away from me on the straights and I would catch him under braking and in the turns.


My best lap time was 2:11.


In the Saturday morning Qualifying session, conditions were about perfect for fast times!

I took advantage and reduced my WR Best lap time to 2:03.813, with a backup of 2:04.634.

I qualified 27th out of 34 cars.


In the Saturday afternoon Race, I found myself chasing a Porsche 356 S90GT.

Like the Morgan, he would leave me on the straight and I would catch him in the turns.

But toward the end of the race, the 356 turned up the wick and left me for good.

I finished 22nd out of 30 cars.


I turned a 2:05.8 lap time, the 356 did a 2:03.01.


The Sunday morning race was a bit lonely, I could see traffic ahead of me the whole race.

I set a comfortable pace with a best of 2:05.5. I finished 22nd out of 29 cars.



I was lazy and didn't do any Weber tuning but saw a lot of high 11s on the AFg.


I'm getting a bit disappointed with SVRA, They have 19 events on their calendar this year!

I think they have reached the level of their incompetence.

Trying to deal with them regarding the logistics of their events was hopeless.


AND, unlike Fontana and other events, they did NOT give awards for ALL of the class wins at Laguna, BOOOOOO!!

I finished 1st in FP both races....


Also, The Gold medallion program seems to be falling by the wayside..... sigh

Tom Sakai ran the middle of the pack with the Tiger and finished 4th in BP.

Good times had at the track!
 
Last edited:

Jay Laifman

Donation Time
That is a bummer about the Gold Medallion program. It seemed like a good idea. But we did see at least a couple cars that were in it that made us scratch our heads about just how serious they were about it. Once we finally do get the Elva up and ready, we'll have to see where the best options are for us to bring it. We have volunteered at VARA because of people we know there. But they don't have any run groups we'd really want the Elva squeezed into.
 

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
Yes, VARA is looking better again.

And the Monterey Historics/Reunion is Really up in the air, as far as I am concerned!

HSR seems to also have issues that leave me not thrilled to get involved.
 

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
Some changes are happening in the world of the WR Alpine!

Tom Sakai and Steve Alcala have come to an agreement

on the sale of Steve's Alpine Racing parts.

The plan is to install Steve's Best engine in the WR Alpine

for testing and tuning.


When Steve ran this engine, he was constrained by being "Original"

and/or period correct parts with the Zenith carbs and std Stock Tri-Y

exhaust on the Sebring Alpine.

Steve knew the Alpine would not be competitive in the current VR world

(with his limited budget) so his main goal was reliability being the key to the most fun.


Tom's goal is to get in the game of current VR with the "Love Bug"

Alpine.

This means, currently, being able to run mid 1:45s or better at Willow Springs.

So the WR Alpine is the test bed.

With that goal, the WR has a NEW engine!

Steve and I swapped engines last Tuesday.


Right off the bat, we are running the 40mm Webers with 34 mm chokes,

but still with the Stock early Tri-Ys.


The Atalla header has been test fitted OK and WILL be tested

When the rest of the exhaust to go with it is made.


With the Aluminum Flywheel, the FEEL of the car is TRANSFORMED!

Previously, with the Heavy stock flywheel, it was VERY easy to quickly

open the Throttle of the Webers and cause a BIG flat spot/

stall of the engine!

NO More! At least standing still at idle...


Driving the car, is a different situation, more work

on the Webers is needed, most likely in the Accelerator pump world?


However, in spite of the BIGGER cam, Street Drive-ability is

Amazingly GOOD!


So far, with an initial "drive a-round the block",

CLEARLY, the engine runs Stronger up to 6000 RPMs,

my RPM limit so far!

My next step is mod the 40 Carbs for more flow and then

check/adjust the Jetting of the Webers.
 
Last edited:

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
Current plans are to run the WR Alpine with the Cobra Club at Willow Springs Oct 29-30.

Steve Alcala will be driving.

Depending how this goes, I may run the car at the VARA Big Bore bash the following weekend,

also at Willow.

With this stronger engine, the need for a Rev limiter is MUCH more called for.

So, I want to jump to an Electronic Ignition. It's been on my list, but I have been dragging my feet.

DW
 
Last edited:

alpine_64

Donation Time
Current plans are to run the WR Alpine with the Cobra Club at Willow Springs Oct 29-30.

Steve Alcala will be driving.

Depending how this goes, I may run the car at the VARA Big Bore bash the following weekend,

also at Willow.

With this stronger engine, the need for a Rev limiter is MUCH more called for.

So, I want to jump to an Electronic Ignition. It's been on my list, but I have been dragging my feet.

DW
Dan, what type of EI are you allowed? Just points replacement inside distributor or can you use high output distributor and coil elec ignition ?
 

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
I currently have a MSD Rev limiter in the car that is disabled.

My plan was to change the Dist to a late model (British) Mag pickup OEM Dist

to trigger an MSD box.

I also have 2 different Pertronics units to play with.

I may go the Pertronics route, only because it's the easiest

way to keep using the stock SV Tach, currently in service.

I'm not too worried about the Vintage/Legal aspects of the EI, at this point.

DW
 
Last edited:

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
Been awhile...

I played with the Rev limiter and was semi-happy it would keep the engine from over reving.

However, the action is quite rude by basically shutting off the engine at the limit.

...nothing SOFT about THAT limiter!


There are some differences with this other engine.

This one has a Bigger cam, bigger exhaust valves and bigger exhaust ports.

The old engine has a duel pattern cam of 238 deg INtake and 245 deg EXhuast @ .050

The new engine has a single pattern cam of 250 @ .050

Both cams have a 110 LC.


The old engine has more compression with .032 pop-up pistons

The new engine has flat top lighter pistons and lighter rods.

The two engines run quite different, more than I would expect!

The smaller cam, higher compression, and bigger flywheel engine

idles rougher and, of course revs slower.

The bigger cam, lower compression and lighter flywheel engine

idles much smoother and revs free as the breeze.... up to a point.


I was planning for a noticeable change at the Track.

We took the WR Alpine to the Cobra Club Track event Oct 29-30.

The Weather was quite good, but with a little unwanted wind in the afternoon.

But, the bad news is the Alpine would Go No faster....

Lap times were the same!


Clearly, max power was the same... sigh...

WORK continues.... slowly... enthusiasm is challenged....

However, Opportunity is KING!!

...And just as things need doing, So Cal gets an extended dose of Winter....

I drove in the Snow, and didn't need to go to the Mountains to do it.

DW
 
Last edited:

alpine_64

Donation Time
Been awhile...

I played with the Rev limiter and was semi-happy it would keep the engine from over reving.

However, the action is quite rude by basically shutting off the engine at the limit.

...nothing SOFT about THAT limiter!


There are some differences with this other engine.

This one has a Bigger cam, bigger exhaust valves and bigger exhaust ports.

The old engine has a duel pattern cam of 238 deg INtake and 245 deg EXhuast @ .050

The new engine has a single pattern cam of 250 @ .050

Both cams have a 110 LC.


The old engine has more compression with .032 pop-up pistons

The new engine has flat top lighter pistons and lighter rods.

The two engines run quite different, more than I would expect!

The smaller cam, higher compression, and bigger flywheel engine

DW
Dan,

Is the new engine the new school piston and rod setup?

You said you went to a single pattern cam on this motor. was this as it was what you had available..or was a conscious switch.. my understanding is that a longer duration cam on exhaust helps us for to the limitation of the exhaust port design.

What is the compression difference?

You said top power is the same.. but the new motor with lighter internals and flywheel revs faster (as expected) what's the mid range performance and response like on the new motor.. was the running on the new motor also with the new mods to the Weber's?
 

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
MK, The current engine is an older Alcala engine.

It has Omega pistons and custom Triumph type rods.

The long block engine, with cam, came out of England.

We just bolted it in place of the older-yet Alcala engine,

Same intake and Exhaust.

Clearly, we need to make some changes.

DW
 
Last edited:

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
With the bigger cam (even though very little more exhaust timing),

bigger exhaust valves and ports, the exhaust has a noticeably bigger

Bark. I'm leaning toward changing the header next.

... I'm just a bit on the fence about what size to make the rest of the exhaust system.

DW
 
Last edited:

jdoclogan

Platinum Level Sponsor
Jerry Titus and Doane Spencer tested different exhaust sizes in 1962. After trying larger and smaller exhaust size against the OEM exhaust size they concluded the OEM gave the best performance (track times).

I'm hoping to get some Dyno results on my (4 into 1 with 15" collector) 1.25" (1" ID) header system once my two engines builds are completed.
 
Last edited:

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
2023 is Marching on, mostly without me, because of the unusual cool and wet So Cal Winter.

But event dates add a needed incentive to Get things Done...

So I checked into the status of the Monterey Historics (by another name..)

The entries are Still open BUT the $1600 fee is a bit of a BIG pill to swallow!


And then, I read there are plans to Resurface the Laguna Seca Track and Spend

$14 MILLION on improvements! ....( BTW, $14 Mil is ...$1600 X 8750....just saying...)

The sad thing is, when I compare the way Laguna Seca is, to other Tracks, IT IS THE BEST!


And Then I hear there are more Changes in Management at the Track...

Maybe another year to sit out Monterey...

DW
 
Last edited:

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
With the So Cal Weather finally getting to the point

of My very spoiled limited temp/humidity range,

I started playing with the aftermarket/cheap Weber 45 DCOE want-to-be carbs.

They are not as consistent as I had hoped.


After chasing my tail with inconsistent results,

I concluded there was a basic problem.

So I started from scratch.

I checked the float levels.

They were off. Or more accurately, the two carbs did not match.

The rear Carb had a higher float level than the Front Carb.

So much for the NEW carbs setup/consistency!

After equalizing the float levels, things started working better.

But the fuel mixture is still all over the place.

The carbs have wild swings from rich to lean.

But basically, the carbs are too rich, at least at low throttle ranges.

I need to figure out what is a good float height.

And also, it looks like the rear Carb leaks somewhere, Hmmmm.

BUT, it seems the inconsistent carberation is bringing out a problem

with the ignition.

The engine is missing to the point of a questionable ignition system.

Yet another reason to jump to an electronic ignition.

The carbs seem to have a very narrow range of GOOD settings.

Very little changes seem to make Big/bad effects.

Of course, at this point, I am expecting perfect carburation,

from idle to full throttle high RPM.

At this point, NOT happening.

But the main use will be above 2500 rpms, so I'm still hopeful.

DW
 

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
Funny how them pesky ignition points NEED maintenance!

...and how the changing point gap changes the Timing...

AND how it runs Way better with the correct Point dwell

and ignition timing.


Also, how Mysteriously, problems that LOOK like Carb problems

just DISAPPEAR, when the ignition is doing the right thing at the right time.


The Alpine is the only car in the fleet with points, ....at least for now....

It's too easy to forget about them!


I take back ALL them bad thoughts I had about the "Repo China Webers"

...at least for now.

Things are looking UP for a change.

DW
 
Last edited:

spmdr

Diamond Level Sponsor
I researched the Float level and recalled the floats looked too high.

I peeled the carbs back apart and verified the float level was about

an 1/8" too high. I reset the levels and, yet again, Everything got Better!

I ended up putting all the jets that came with the Carbs Back in, with GREAT

results.


I was concerned about the quality of these Repo Carbs, but yet again, at this point,

I'm quite happy with these Carbs.


And better still, the Alpine is running better than ever!


I will be surprised if a better exhaust doesn't move the performance curve up

even higher!

DW


IMG_20230510_142202799.jpg
 
Top