260Alpine
Silver Level Sponsor
This stainless coupling comes in 9/16"-18:
https://www.mcmaster.com/rod-couplings/18-8-stainless-steel-coupling-nuts-8/
https://www.mcmaster.com/rod-couplings/18-8-stainless-steel-coupling-nuts-8/
Welcome to the new SAOCA website. Already a member? Simply click Log In/Sign Up up and to the right and use your same username and password from the old site. If you've forgotten your password, please send an email to membership@sunbeamalpine.org for assistance.
If you're new here, click Log In/Sign Up and enter your information. We'll approve your account as quickly as possible, typically in about 24 hours. If it takes longer, you were probably caught in our spam/scam filter.
Enjoy.
I have one of those. I need couplings that are 9/16" - 18 left hand thread on one end and right hand on the other. I can make them as well as the matching rod threaded 9/16"- 18 on one end and right hand on the other.This stainless coupling comes in 9/16"-18:
https://www.mcmaster.com/rod-couplings/18-8-stainless-steel-coupling-nuts-8/
I have one of those. I need couplings that are 9/16" - 18 left hand thread on one end and right hand on the other. I can make them as well as the matching rod threaded 9/16"- 18 on one end and right hand on the other.
Barry - positioned as it was for the photos, the rack needs to go up over an inch for the top mounted rod end or down 1/2" for the bottom mounted rod end. How sensitive is this parameter? Say it was off parallel 1/4".
Bill
No lottery tickets today. I am too high by 1/2" or too low by over an inch. To go lower is going to make the cutouts much larger and rack mounts very interesting. Interesting to point of cutting the cross member for them. Especially 1/2" lower. That's why I'm fudging with the 1/4". No way I can go up 1". So I will go down or leave it pretty much as is.Bill,
If you're only off parallel by 1/4", you should stop what you are doing and go buy a lottery ticket! From long distance, it seems like going up would reduce the depth of the notches which should be a good thing. If you do go up, make sure everything still clears at full up / down suspension travel and full left / right steering.
What might they be? I was thinking about elongating the mounting holes in the steering arms and rotating the arm.Bill,
Higher with the rack has the advantage of smaller notches and there are ways to raise the tie-rod ends.
What might they be? I was thinking about elongating the mounting holes in the steering arms and rotating the arm.
Bill
Jim, my attitude is "why do it wrong, when you know it can be better". Besides, it is easier to do now than later.Bill, just elongate one hole. It'll pivot on the other one. Probably not the one with the spacer. I'd wait until the engine was in and the suspension loaded before I fine tune for bump steer. I agree with Barry on the higher mount. Notch to the mounting bolt for boot clearance. Get the rack as far back as you can. Pieces of channel for rack mounts.
In the pictures posted by Aladin Sane, the Rack mount points look like part of a muffler clamp.Bill, just elongate one hole. It'll pivot on the other one. Probably not the one with the spacer. I'd wait until the engine was in and the suspension loaded before I fine tune for bump steer. I agree with Barry on the higher mount. Notch to the mounting bolt for boot clearance. Get the rack as far back as you can. Pieces of channel for rack mounts.
Jim, my attitude is "why do it wrong, when you know it can be better". Besides, it is easier to do now than later.
How to do it. Here are my calculations, put out for any correction needed, either thought process or arithmetic.
The holes in the arms are laid out: 2.764" mounting holes, center to center.
Tie rod hole to first mounting hole, 4.75".
Dividing distance to tie rod hole divided by mounting hole separation, 4.75/2.764 =1.72:1
Distance to elevate divided by ratio .5/1.72 = .290" distance to elongate most distant hole. The sticky part is the hole wall thickness is .250" If I elongate each hole .145" the overall effect would be the same, leaving .100" sidewall.
Okay guys, stop me, or at least correct me before it is too late.
Bill
Barry, thanks a big bunch for not only valaditing but correcting my thought plan. Your response is exactly the reason for my post. I look at it this way, .113" is 1/32" less than .145". A measurable improvement. I think I will do .100" offset, leaving .150" sidewall. How much do you suppose that compromises the strength of the arm? Should I be even more conservative? Maybe install a strap from mounting hole to mounting hole?Bill,
I agree with moving both mounting holes, but I calculate a slightly smaller amount of offset.
My thought process is that:
If both mounting holes are equally offset, the steering arm will pivot around an imaginary point halfway between the mounting holes. The distance between the imaginary point and the tie-rod mounting hole is 2.764" / 2 = 1.382" + 4.75" = 6.132".
If the tie-rod mount is moved up / down by 0.5" while the steering arm pivots around the imaginary point halfway between the mounting holes, the mounting holes will both move by 1.382" / 6.132" = 0.225 x 0.5" = 0.113" hole offset.
To confirm the calculated hole offset, I made a full-scale sketch which showed offsets of slightly less than 1/8".
0.113" is not a lot less than 0.145", but ...
HTH
No Toyota rack. The PO attached a Toyota steering wheel to the shaft that goes to the MG rack.Bill, your rack looks identical to Aladin's and my MGB rack. Maybe Toyota copied it? Maybe custom tierods? The MGB is about the same width as the Sunbeam but the bent tie rods may require the adapters? I showed a picture earlier with no adapters and the MGB tie rods are long.
Shouldn't your U joints be in phase?Bearing mount isn't necessary unless you have more than two Ujoints or a long shaft. View attachment 20638 The vibration reducer is a rubber sleeve in the top Ujoint in this MGB: